Main Sections
Grizzly Bear
Grizzly bears are recognized as a species of special importance within the province of British Columbia. Their role as a large predator in the ecosystem is considered an important barometer of ecosystem health. Historically they have played an important role for resident / non-resident hunting and other tourism values. The CCLUP notes that the South Chilcotin SRDZ is an important area for Grizzly bear. Strategies are designed to ensure that habitat suitability for Grizzly bear is maintained through time.
In general, grizzly bears require large areas that are relatively undisturbed, with a low risk of mortality or displacement, and an assured supply of critical habitats. Critical habitats are areas that are well suited for food, bedding or denning, especially where these are in short supply. They include avalanche tracks, meadows and wetlands that are rich in herbs, glacier lilies, white bark pine, skunk cabbage and berries. Salmon spawning areas are also important. Most critical habitats are relatively small areas (1 to 5 hectares) but they contribute disproportionately to forage requirements.
General issues across the plan area will be addressed below, followed by management plans specific to individual populations.
Issues:
- Increased risk of death or displacement due to interactions between humans and bears (e.g., defence of life and property killing; illegal hunting; road development near important grizzly habitat; death and displacement from traffic; fragmentation of home ranges; and separation of populations).
- Canopy closure in maturing forests can reduce the sustained supply of forage.
- Loss of critical grizzly bear habitats.
- Improper range management can degrade habitat and displace bears.
- Recreation and tourism use or development can affect a range of grizzly bear habitats and potentially cause displacement or mortality.
Goals:
- Viable, healthy grizzly bear populations living in suitable habitats across their natural ranges.
Objectives | Management Direction/Strategies | Measures of Success/Targets | Intent |
---|---|---|---|
1. Increase
knowledge and information available on grizzly bear populations and habitats to inform management decisions within grizzly bear population units (see map) |
1.1 Design and implement inventory
techniques to determine absolute abundance of grizzly bears, and to monitor population trends. Explore systematic seasonal aerial survey and/or DNA/hair collection programs to monitor population trends |
||
1.2 Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection should establish and implement a rigorous sighting record collection and recording system focused on monitoring the annual number of adult female grizzly bears with cubs-of-the-year in identified watersheds | |||
1.3 Establish a grizzly bear mortality-monitoring program including detailed documentation of the circumstances and cause of death | |||
1.4 Identify critical grizzly bear habitats (e.g., types, seasons of use, and ranking of importance), through inventories and ground verification | |||
1.5 Use predictive ecosystem mapping to provide information on critical habitats | |||
2. Manage grizzly
bear populations to the target levels specified (see Tables 1 and 2) |
2.1 The Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection should continue to monitor reports of grizzly bear mortality to ensure that bear mortality from all human causes:
·does not exceed 4% of the estimated population; ·less than 30% of this mortality is female; and ·the total kill is not concentrated in one area |
Grizzly bear recovery
plans developed and implemented Grizzly bear population unit targets achieved |
Population targets
will be updated as new inventories become available |
2.2 Initiate recovery planning | |||
2.3 Consider access management direction in the Access and Transportation section, grizzly bear recovery planning, and future access planning when preparing operational resource development plans | |||
2.4 Consider creating a legal hunt through recovery planning and plan implementation | |||
2.5 Evaluate the effectiveness of the SC Plan grizzly objectives, in terms of achieving recovery, by establishing a bear population monitoring program | |||
3. Increase public
awareness about grizzly bear behaviour and methods to avoid bear/human conflicts and bear mortality |
3.1 Seek a higher level of public
education, deterrence and enforcement of regulations and road closures |
Grizzly bear
mortality due to human interactions decreased |
|
3.2 Implement a Wilderness Watch program (forest users reporting inappropriate activities to conservation officers) to support the conservation officer service | |||
3.3 Implement a warden/guardian program to support the conservation officer service | |||
4 Manage
resource development and use activities in identified watersheds (see map) to recover and sustain viable, healthy grizzly bear populations and habitats by minimizing the access |
4.1 Attempt to overlap grizzly bear
habitat needs with other compatible interests (e.g., riparian areas; old growth management areas) wherever possible to help achieve recovery without unduly restricting development |
Effective
management of public access achieved (see Access and Transportation section) |
Management
benefits grizzly bears by reducing displacement and the risk of mortality (e.g., due to defence of life and property or poaching.) Access for tenure holders will be maintained. Roving security areas are approximately 10 square kilometres in size and are expected to be in place for no less than 20 years to limit disturbance to grizzly bears. They are intended to be non-motorized areas that are not open to public motor vehicle use. Industrial motorized use is permitted, subject to conditions (e.g., spring closures). Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection, in cooperation with Ministry of Forests, Ministry of Energy and Mines, Land and Water BC and licensees, will identify the size and location of roving security areas. Effective access control means mitigating the effects of motorized access. See the Access and Transportation section for direction on access management. Operational plans will identify the specific control measures needed (e.g., seasonal road closures, tank traps, deconstruction of roads, removing bridges,). |
4.2 Concentrate areas of timber harvesting to the greatest extent practicable to minimize open road access using methods such as aggregated cut blocks and other access management strategies | |||
4.3 Provide effective access controls where necessary to achieve roving security areas on road networks within identified watersheds. Where access management fails to achieve roving security areas, minimize open road access and reduce overall road density. | |||
4.4 Seed new roadsides and landings with low palatability species (remove orchard grass, red clover and alfalfa) where appropriate | |||
4.5 Use the seasonal access maps to identify access management direction for public and industrial use | |||
5. Within identified watersheds, stabilize landscape-level food supply in specific ecosystems | 5.1 Maintain naturally occurring non-forested features (avalanche tracks, non-productive brush sites, berry sites) in the non-contributing landbase | Food supply stabilized through replanting or restocking of key areas to promote forage or berry production | |
5.2 Where possible, incorporate prime berry producing sites into wildlife tree patches, provided they have appropriate characteristics | |||
5.3 Maintain grizzly bear forage by managing to minimum stocking standards as targets on selected ecosystems, and carrying out variable inter-tree spacing and/or cluster planting | |||
5.4 Consider designating not satisfactorily restocked areas as grizzly bear forage areas and removing them from the timber harvesting landbase | |||
5.5 In important berry producing areas, minimize the adverse impacts of site preparation and vegetation management (e.g., brushing and weeding) by targeting only the direct competitors with individual crop trees in these areas | |||
5.6 Consider grizzly bear foraging needs in the management of coarse woody debris by retaining larger pieces within the limits of current provincial policy | |||
5.7 Where possible, timber harvesting should occur on a snowpack that would buffer disturbance to Vaccinium species (huckleberries and grouse berries). Where timber harvesting is not done on snowpack, make reasonable efforts to minimize disturbance to Vaccinium species | |||
6. Maintain the
suitability of critical grizzly bear habitats, and ensure these habitats have adequate security and thermal cover associated with them |
6.1 Avoid or mitigate
activity/development (e.g., road building, timber harvesting, site preparation) that negatively alters or reduces the extent of the vegetative community of critical habitats |
Grizzly bear
management achieved using the timber harvesting land base planning allowance of 8,000 hectares |
Critical grizzly bear
habitats are areas with high forage, bedding or proven denning value for grizzly bears, especially where these habitats are in short supply Critical habitat will normally be deferred from forest development, including road construction and timber harvesting. However, managers and planners must determine if there are: 1) historic rights and tenures of human use on that area; or 2) if there are no practicable alternatives to development. If existing human use takes precedent or there are no practicable alternatives, then the prescriptions should recognize the inherent critical habitat status through application of appropriate mitigation and bear/human conflict prevention measures |
6.2 Maintain a minimum of a 50 m conifer forested buffer or equivalent forested cover adjacent to critical habitats for security and thermal cover. Buffer non-forested critical habitats with natural configurations of adjacent forest cover | |||
6.3 Where forestry roads cross avalanche chutes, and risk of downslope movement exists, recontour roads after timber harvesting to prevent loss of important grizzly bear habitat | |||
6.4 Where possible, place critical habitats into constrained areas (e.g., old growth management areas) | |||
6.5 Tourism operators should avoid critical grizzly bear habitat when locating new uses, camps, trails or grazing areas | |||
6.6 For mineral exploration, as much as practicable, avoid constructing access roads or blasting in occupied critical habitats in the spring | |||
7. Manage range
use and grizzly bear interactions that can lead to livestock losses, bear mortality, displacement, habitat alteration and degradation |
7.1 Consult with the Ministry of
Water, Land and Air Protection before expansion or issuance of new cattle and sheep range tenures or before an increase in animal unit months within identified watersheds. Tenure-specific management strategies may be required to address bear and cattle/sheep conflicts |
Reduce the
conflicts that lead to mortality losses of domestic livestock and bears, and displacement and habitat loss of grizzly bears Manage range tenures to reduce impacts. Risk would be determined by factors such as known occurrences, suitability of habitat, and season of cattle grazing Not intended to extinguish licensed operators; instead, manage identified impacts (including areas where potential problems/impacts have been identified) from livestock This recognizes the difference in severity between grizzly bear interactions with cows and sheep versus those with horses |
|
7.2 Include management strategies in range use plans that will minimize conflicts, habitat displacement, alteration, degradation and loss | |||
7.3 Manage for grizzly bear forage by setting in range use plans, desired plant communities that favour grizzly bear forage within critical habitats | |||
7.4 Avoid cattle/sheep use of identified critical habitats, especially during the period when grizzly bear use is expected in these habitats, in existing tenures | |||
8. Implement
appropriate measures to reduce bear-human interactions |
8.1 Reduce the availability of non-
natural attractants such as garbage to grizzly bears by bear-proofing garbage cans, dumpsters and landfills |
Grizzly bear
mortality due to human interactions decreased |
|
8.2 Require bear-proofing of remote commercial, industrial or research camps | |||
9. Minimize
negative interactions between grizzly bears and recreational activities in identified watersheds (see map) |
9.1 Avoid trail or campsite
development in or near critical habitats to minimize impacts and mortality risks to bears |
Grizzly bear
mortality due to human interactions decreased |
|
9.2 Conduct bear hazard assessments on existing high use trails (more than 10 parties per week) and campgrounds and consider modifications where hazards are moderate or high | |||
9.3 Where existing high use trails cross avalanche chutes (or other critical habitats), or where trail locations are proposed in or near critical habitats, relocate trail locations wherever possible at least 250 metres away from critical habitats | |||
9.4 When improving existing trails or considering new trails, and where relocation is not a practicable option, maintain visual screening between high use trails and critical habitats | |||
9.5 Consider seasonal trail closures to ensure human safety and minimize bear/human conflicts | |||
9.6 Utilize public education and signage to minimize adverse bear human conflicts along high use trails in critical habitats | |||
10. Manage
recreation and tourism developments to minimize bear/human conflicts and limit impacts on grizzly bear populations and habitat |
10.1 Consider potential grizzly
bear/human conflicts and options for mitigation prior to authorizing new commercial recreation activities within grizzly bear identified watersheds. See the Wildlife- Commercial Recreation guidelines on the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection’s website |
The scope, detail,
and extent of planning and monitoring will depend on the scale and location of the proposal Consistent with existing legislation, large-scale recreation and tourism developments will be examined through the environmental assessment process This includes examining cumulative impacts during the planning, review and monitoring of new commercial and non-commercial recreation applications, as well as public recreation development (e.g., Forest Service recreation sites, park improvements) in identified watersheds (see map) |
|
10.2 Avoid fee simple sales of Crown land on or immediately adjacent to critical grizzly bear habitat within identified watersheds | |||
10.3 Refer to relevant memoranda
of understanding or agreements respecting grizzly bears and management of their habitats |
|||
11. To maintain grizzly bear habitat quality and quantity through time within the area of the plan. | 11.1 Finish activities, to the fullest extent possible, within each watershed prior to starting up in an adjacent one to minimize industrial disturbance and human interaction. | ||
11.2 Complete each harvest entry as quickly as possible. | |||
11.3 To manage polygon area 1C(b), (Appendix III Map 9), on a 135 year rotation, 15% removal / 20 year re-entry on the planimetric basis. Planimetric view is the guide for performance assessment. Critical viewpoints must be fixed and (not added to) or adjusted. It is expected that you could achieve recommended VQOs of retention / partial retention from viewpoints predetermined in this plan. If not achievable, the planimetric takes precedence. No other constraining influences, other than those that have been modeled, will apply. | |||
11.4 It is assumed that future determination of VQOs within polygon 1C (b) will guarantee timber access to 100% of the productive forest land base within polygon 1C (b) (subject to other constraints as modeled by the SC Planning Table) over a 135 year rotation. Where VQOs are recommended that are more constraining to operational access than that modeled, VQO recommendations for the remainder of the polygon must be relaxed to accommodate timber access targets developed by the SC Planning Table. It is recommended that the above ‘VQO Relaxation Process’ be completed prior to formal VQO designations in the area. | |||
11.5 Design Blocks with “creating edge” in mind. | |||
12. Apply biodiversity objectives | 12.1 It is anticipated that these strategies, along with the application of biodiversity objectives will satisfy grizzly bear habitat requirements. | ||
12.2 Protection and enhancement of shrub layer should be considered in development of harvesting prescriptions and site prep. | |||
12.3 Blocks in areas known to contain resident grizzly bears should be designed with interior Wildlife Tree Patches of at least 2 hectares. | |||
12.4 WTP should be concentrated along riparian corridors, in areas of high shrub production, in wet forest types, along game trails, etc. | |||
12.5 Where there is a choice to either make a number of smaller WTP or fewer larger ones it is generally better to create fewer large patches than a number of small scattered patches. | |||
13. Control access. | 13.1 Restrict use of vehicles and ATVs for hunting. (See current hunting regulations and SC Access Management Plan, Section 3.5). | ||
13.2 Minimize non-industrial use of newly constructed roads consistent with the SC Access Management objectives and strategies. | |||
13.3 Minimize road density to only those roads required for ongoing industrial activity. | |||
13.4 Align main roads several hundred metres away from areas known/or suspected to be important foraging, denning, or travel routes (riparian areas, wet forest types, areas of high herbaceous plant or berry production, etc.) | |||
13.5 Deactivate spur roads immediately following harvest as per temporary access provisions under SC Access Management objectives. |
Table 3 - Stocking standard guidelines on forage/berry producing site series
Intent: Applies to all applicable tree species excepting deciduous species.
BEC Unit | Site Series | Current Target | Current Minimum | Proposed Target Crop Trees | Proposed Minimum Crop Trees | Proposed Maximum Total | Comments | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWHds1 | 06 | 900 | 500 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
CWHds1 | 07 | 900 | 500 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
CWHds1 | 08 | 900 | 500 | 500 | 200 | 600 | Floodplain | |
CWHds1 | 09 | 900 | 500 | 500 | 200 | 600 | Floodplain | |
CWHds1 | 12 | 800 | 400 | 400 | 200 | 500 | Skunk cabbage | |
CWHms1 | 05 | 900 | 500 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
CWHms1 | 06 | 900 | 500 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
CWHms1 | 07 | 900 | 500 | 500 | 200 | 600 | Floodplain | |
CWHms1 | 08 | 900 | 500 | 500 | 200 | 600 | Floodplain | |
CWHms1 | 11 | 800 | 400 | 400 | 200 | 500 | Skunk cabbage | |
IDFdk1 | 06 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
IDFdk2 | 07 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
IDFww | 05 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
IDFww | 06 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
IDFww | 07 | 1000 | 500 | 400 | 200 | 500 | Skunk cabbage | |
IDFww | 08 | 900 | 500 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
IDFww | 09 | 900 | 500 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFdc2 | 01 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFdc2 | 05 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFdc2 | 06 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFdc2 | 08 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFdv | 01 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFdv | 04 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFdv | 06 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFmw | 01 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFmw | 04 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFmw | 05 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFmw | 06 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFmw | 07 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFmw | 08 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFxc | 06 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFxv | 06 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFxv | 07 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
ESSFxv | 08 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
ESSFxv | 09 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||
MSdc | 05 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
MSdc | 06 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
MSdc | 07 | 1200 | 700 | 600 | 400 | 700 | ||
MSdc | 08 | 1000 | 500 | 500 | 300 | 600 | ||